It’s the skill and talent of the operator. Not workarounds.Īnd for those Cubase users that think there’s a DAW race going on, and you think your music is better with more more more features, the problem is NOT the DAW. And please, no one tell me how they already do ripple editing right now. But with the new licensing system behind them now, maybe just focus on core features, make them bullet-proof, and for godsakes, please give us true RIPPLE EDITING after all these years. Instead of rush rush rush, more, more more, cloud, cloud, cloud, crap, crap, crap, subscription, subscription, subscription.Īnyway, I get Steinberg has to make money. But it sure would be great if a DAW maker just focused on quality, quality, quality. I’m happy that Fender hasn’t dismantled Studio One’s team and they are still creating pretty good software, and I’m happy that Avid now has 500,000 subscribers, good for them. I’d rather they spend the time to solidify everything BEFORE release this time.Īnd honestly, who wants their DAW to be in a “feature-race” with other DAWs? That just makes for sloppy work and poor design for everything.
I know they need revenue, but the old yearly cycle was not optimal IMO, and some features in past years would not get as much love as they really needed before release, and Steinberg would have to spend too much time bringing them up to production level later on. I’d rather Steinberg take this opportunity of the “reset” of their sales schedule, to get on really solid footing with a killer version 13 with a complete focus on core feature and workflow and totally rock solid reliability. I, for one, don’t want them to rush Cubase 13 or Nuendo 13.
0 kommentar(er)
